Why I Gave Up New Year's Resolutions

I'm sitting in my office at my desk and I just looked over to my right, and I suddenly realized: I need to get a new calendar. There are no days left on my calendar. It's December 31. And I'm going out for New Year's Eve tonight, and by the time I get home it will be 2015. (Note to self: before leaving office, thrown 2014 calendar in the garbage.)

January 1 seems so arbitrary to me. I'm thinking here of so-called New Year's Resolutions. Why "New Year's" Resolutions? Why not just "Resolutions"? I've often told people that long, long ago I set a New Year's Resolution that I have been able to keep for many years - I resolved to never again make a New Year's Resolution. So, far - so good! Mission accomplished. And now I'm wondering why we make New Year's Resolutions anyway? Yeah. I get the significance of the date. It IS a new year after all. So, sure, you want to start things off on the right foot, so to speak. But it still strikes me as arbitrary. And, spiritually, well - why? What's the point of deciding that all (or at least some) good things will start or all (or at least some) bad things will stop on January 1? Let me share my three biggest spiritual objections to New Year's Resolutions.

First, you're setting yourself up for failure. We all know that people who make New Year's Resolutions don't keep most of them. Often, it's only a matter of time before we break down. So, why set yourself up like that? Why make such a big thing out of deciding to do something or not do something that you actually give it a name and a date that ensures that when you fail you're going to remember? That doesn't make sense. That's very close to planning for failure - which is never a recipe for success, unless, of course, you want to fail, in which case you'll probably succeed. But if your goal is actually to do something positive or to stop doing something negative, then why start by setting yourself up so blatantly to fail? That doesn't make sense.

Second (and very much related to the first) is that the probability of failure is almost a denial of divine grace. Why do I say that? Because you're going to feel like a failure when you don't do the thing you pledged to do or stop the thing you pledged to stop. And it seems to me that the more you set yourself up for failure, the more you're going to fail, and the more you're going to fail at something you pledged to succeed at, the less likely it is that you're going to feel as if God wants to shower you with grace. He does. God wants to shower you with grace. So commit to doing your best in all things. Commit to living a life more fully reflecting the life of Jesus. Don't expect that it's going to happen all at once. Don't make it an all or nothing / success or failure sort of thing. Christianity is about ongoing transformation. If we get it into our heads that everything's going to be fine as of January 1 when our New Year's Resolution takes effect, then we're going to find ourselves pretty guilty when we wake up on January 1 and discover that we're not much different than we were on December 31. If you make it a "Resolution" then you have to do it or not do it and never slip up. If you make it a part of your ongoing walk of faith, you can let the Holy Spirit work on you gradually.

Finally, why procrastinate? Let me put it this way. If there's something in your life that really, really needs to change right away then why put it off? If there's something you're doing that you know you shouldn't be doing then why set a deadline? Jesus didn't say to the woman caught in adultery, "Go and sin no more beginning on January 1." He said "Go and sin no more." If there's something that you really should be doing but you've been putting off then why put it off some more. Jesus didn't say "love your neighbour starting on January 1." He just said "love your neighbour." Start making the changes you need to make right away (keeping in mind what I said above that there will always be slip ups along the way, and that God's grace will cover those.) But don't put off making positive changes for the sake of some arbitrary date on the calendar.

I understand the appeal of New Year's Resolutions. January 1 may be arbitrary, but it has a symbolic value - even from a spiritual point of view. Paul tells us that in Christ we are a new creation - that the old has passed away and the new has come. What better way to symbolize that then by connecting positive changes to January 1? Except for the three things I mentioned above!

Just change what you need to change. Don't wait for January 1. If the thought comes to you on September 16, and it seems good to the Holy Spirit and to you, then make the change then rather than waiting until January 1.

As for me, I'm still going to keep the one New Year's Resolution that I've never broken - no New Year's Resolutions for me this year. I'm just gonna take life as it comes, a day at a time, and try to remember that Jesus is walking the path with me every day.

A Thought For The Week Of December 29

"For all the gods of the nations are idols,  but the Lord made the heavens." (Psalm 96:5) The words "all the gods of the nations" strike home with me today. How easy it is for us to set up our own gods; to choose to devote our lives to something and to make that "something" the only thing that matters to us. There are, of course, all sorts of gods all around us. The phrase "the gods of the nations" is interesting. I'm taking this a wee bit out of context (it means the gods of all the different peoples) but there's still a connection here that works. One of the primary "gods of the nations" is the nation itself. Nation-states set themselves up as almost god-like entities. They demand absolute loyalty from their citizens, and they threaten punishment (or at least consequences) to those who don't offer absolute loyalty. And isn't that essentially what a "god" does? And I wonder how much of our faith as Christians has been impacted by this vision of what nations and gods do? We claim to believe in a God of love and grace, and yet too often we ourselves almost equate God with the nation, and we attribute to God the same qualities possessed by the nation - the demand for absolute loyalty and the threat of punishment or consequences for disloyalty. But is that really God? The God revealed by Jesus? To me, it's a warped image of God - warped by the entanglement of the church with the state and put in place by those (in both the nation and the church) who want to demand absolute loyalty from their people. Maybe that's why the Psalm tells us to "say among the nations, 'The Lord reigns.'" We're to constantly call people away from idolatry - away from the attempts of nation, church or anything else to draw us away from God. God - revealed by Jesus - is a God of love, grace, mercy and forgiveness. That God has the only real claim on our allegiance, our loyalty or our faith. As a new year beckons us to adventures unknown, my prayer is that we will give our allegiance to God, and leave all our other gods behind us.

December 24 (11pm) sermon: From Joseph's Perspective

 This is how the birth of Jesus the Messiah came about: His mother Mary was pledged to be married to Joseph, but before they came together, she was found to be pregnant through the Holy Spirit. Because Joseph her husband was faithful to the law, and yet did not want to expose her to public disgrace, he had in mind to divorce her quietly. But after he had considered this, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream and said, “Joseph son of David, do not be afraid to take Mary home as your wife, because what is conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit. She will give birth to a son, and you are to give him the name Jesus, because he will save his people from their sins.” All this took place to fulfil what the Lord had said through the prophet: “The virgin will conceive and give birth to a son, and they will call him Immanuel”(which means “God with us”). When Joseph woke up, he did what the angel of the Lord had commanded him and took Mary home as his wife. But he did not consummate their marriage until she gave birth to a son. And he gave him the name Jesus.

(Matthew 1:18-25)

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

     When I meet with couples who are preparing to be married, there's one piece of advice that I always give to the grooms – I tell them that they have to remember and accept that the wedding at least is all about the bride. Just nod your head and say, “yes, honey. I agree.” It's the easiest way. It really is. Because the bride will get her way anyway as the marriage is planned, and frankly planning a wedding is a bit of a headache anyway if you're a guy. Sit back, put your feet up, watch hockey and football and just say “yes.” Just agree. It makes life a lot simpler. I was thinking about that as I was looking ahead to Christmas Eve this year. I don't usually deal with either of the actual Christmas stories at the Communion service. I figure that I've done that at 7:00. Why go through it again. So I usually try to find something a little bit deeper – befitting Holy Communion. But I started thinking about the two Christmas stories – Luke's which we read at 7:00, and Matthew's, which we just read a moment ago. They're very different stories, and one thing that leaps out at me as I read them is that Joseph would probably understand my advice if he and Mary were asking me to conduct their wedding. Think about this. Eight verses. That's all Joseph gets. Eight pretty skimpy verses. In the entire New Testament, as far as I can tell, Joseph gets mentioned a paltry 15 times. Meanwhile, Mary's story takes up the better part of two entire chapters of Luke's Gospel, and she remains a part of the story until the very end, watching as Jesus is crucified. It's all about Mary, it seems.

     But I don't want us to forget about Joseph. There are a variety of reasons that people think might be the reason for the rather short shrift he gets. Some think that he was likely old and perhaps died not long after Jesus was born. That's possible, but others think there's a more reasonable explanation – the early Christians just didn't know what to make of Joseph, and they were perhaps a little embarrassed by him. After all, Jesus' father was God. The story is very clear about that. So what place does Joseph really have?

     Some would say that the important thing about Joseph is that he's Jesus' link (even if a bit of a tenuous one, since God is really Jesus' father) to the house of David – which was necessary for Jesus to be the Jewish Messiah. Some would say that Joseph teaches us to be kind and merciful and compassionate. After all, when Mary broke the news that she was pregnant, Joseph could perhaps have been excused if his reaction had been a little bit harsh. Instead, rather than humiliating her or even handing her over to be stoned (which he could have done) Joseph simply decides to handle the whole matter quietly. Some see Joseph as the protector of his family. When Herod resolved to kill all the baby boys of Bethlehem, Joseph took his family out of harm's way to Egypt. Those are all wonderful qualities of Joseph – qualities we should try to display in our own lives. But I think there's something more about Joseph that often gets overlooked: Joseph was a man of very deep faith.

     When you think about the story, it would have been very easy for Joseph not to believe. His fiance had come to him and told him that she was pregnant – and that no man was responsible; it was God's doing. Ready to walk out of the proposed marriage, Joseph is visited by an angel – and gets the impossible story shared with him again. And – somehow and in some way (and I'm not sure I'd have responded this way) Joseph believed. Joseph seemed to grasp that God could work in the most mysterious and unexpected of ways. When Joseph heard from God – no matter how unbelievable and even ridiculous the message may have seemed – Joseph believed, and Joseph acted.

     Joseph is a model of faith. Gathered here tonight, let's not forget his important place in the Christmas story.

December 24 (7pm) sermon: Christmas, Sir, Is A Humbug!

 In those days Caesar Augustus issued a decree that a census should be taken of the entire Roman world. (This was the first census that took place while Quirinius was governor of Syria.) And everyone went to their own town to register. So Joseph also went up from the town of Nazareth in Galilee to Judea, to Bethlehem the town of David, because he belonged to the house and line of David. He went there to register with Mary, who was pledged to be married to him and was expecting a child. While they were there, the time came for the baby to be born, and she gave birth to her firstborn, a son. She wrapped him in cloths and placed him in a manger, because there was no guest room available for them. And there were shepherds living out in the fields nearby, keeping watch over their flocks at night. An angel of the Lord appeared to them, and the glory of the Lord shone around them, and they were terrified. But the angel said to them, “Do not be afraid. I bring you good news that will cause great joy for all the people. Today in the town of David a Savior has been born to you; he is the Messiah, the Lord. This will be a sign to you: You will find a baby wrapped in cloths and lying in a manger.” Suddenly a great company of the heavenly host appeared with the angel, praising God and saying, “Glory to God in the highest heaven, and on earth peace to those on whom his favor rests.” When the angels had left them and gone into heaven, the shepherds said to one another, “Let’s go to Bethlehem and see this thing that has happened, which the Lord has told us about.” So they hurried off and found Mary and Joseph, and the baby, who was lying in the manger. When they had seen him, they spread the word concerning what had been told them about this child, and all who heard it were amazed at what the shepherds said to them. But Mary treasured up all these things and pondered them in her heart. The shepherds returned, glorifying and praising God for all the things they had heard and seen, which were just as they had been told.

(Luke 2:1-20)

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

     I love Dickens. He is truly one of the great authors in the history of the English language. Ovet the course of his life, Dickens wrote 15 novels. The most famous were probably “Great Expectations” and “A Tale of Two Cities.” But he's probably best known for one work in particular: “A Christmas Carol.” It's the story of the miserly Ebenezer Scrooge – probably Dickens' most iconic character - whose sole goal in life seems to be to take the joy out of Christmas for everyone connected with him, but who, in the end, undergoes a monumental transformation of heart and soul as the result of visits from the Ghosts of Christmas Past, Present and Future. But while we applaud Scrooge's transformation, the image most people have of him is of the miser. In fact, the Merriam-Webster Dictionary includes the word “scrooge.” It's a noun, defined as “a miserly person.” Among the synonyms the dictionary offers for “scrooge” are cheapskate, skinflint, tightwad and penny-pincher. Well, sometimes I like to go against the grain, and I started wondering if poor old Ebenezer wasn't getting a bit of a bad rap. Maybe he understood something about Christmas that the rest of us don't. In the most famous movie version of the story, we first meet Ebenezer on Christmas Eve of 1843 – and we're outside the London Stock Exchange.

 BUSINESS MAN #1

Ah, Mister Scrooge...

SCROOGE 

Your servant, sir.

BUSINESS MAN #1

Are you off home to keep Christmas?

SCROOGE 

I am not in the habit of keeping Christmas, 

sir.

BUSINESS MAN #2

Then why are you leaving so early?

SCROOGE 

Christmas has a habit of keeping men from 

doing business.

BUSINESS MAN #2

Come, it's in the nature of things that ants 

toil and grasshoppers sing and play, Mister 

Scrooge.

SCROOGE 

An ant is what it is and a grasshopper is what 

it is and Christmas, sir, is a humbug. Good 

day.

     Poor Ebenezer. He sounds so miserable. Think of those words: “Christmas, sir, is a humbug.” A humbug! You know what? I didn't even know what a “humbug” was – but it's not an insect like ants or grasshoppers! So, what was Ebenezer saying? Well, I looked up “humbug” in my dictionary. In Britain, it's a mint-flavoured candy, but I don't think that's what Ebenezer was referring to. I think he was thinking more along the lines of this definition that Merriam-Webster includes: “ an attitude or spirit of pretense and deception.” Really? Christmas could be thought of in that way? But – but – Christmas is so wonderful. And, as we all know, people are so much happier and friendlier and more generous at Christmas. Which might actually be the problem. Is it possible that our friend Ebenezer might have been on to something. Could Christmas really be a humbug? Could it be filled with pretense and deception? Let's fast forward through the story a bit. It's later on Christmas Eve. At his office, Ebenezer is visited by two more businessmen, who are on a mission that Ebenezer is not going to think too kindly toward.

BUSINESSMAN # 1: This is Scrooge & Marley's, I believe. Do I have the pleasure of addressing Mr. Scrooge or Mr. Marley?

SCROOGE: Mr. Marley has been dead these past seven years. In fact, he died seven years ago this very night.

BUSINESSMAN # 1: Well, we have no doubt that his generosity is well represented by his surviving partner.

BUSINESSMAN # 2: At this festive season of the year, Mr. Scrooge, it is more than usually desirable that we should make some slight provision for the poor and destitute, who suffer greatly. Many thousands are in want of the most basic necessities; many more thousands are in want of the most common comfort, sir.

SCROOGE: Really? Are there no prisons?

BUSINESSMAN # 2: There are plenty of prisons, Mr. Scrooge.

SCROOGE: And the Union workhouses? Are they still in operation?

BUSINESSMAN # 1: They are, sir. Still, I wish that I could say that they were not.

SCROOGE: The Treadmill and the Poor Law – they must be still in full vigour, then.

BUSINESSMAN # 2: They are both very busy, sir.

SCROOGE: Well, I am relieved. I was afraid, from what you had said at first, that something had occurred to stop them in their useful courses. I'm very glad to hear otherwise.

BUSINESSMAN # 1: I don't think you understand, sir. Such things scarcely furnish Christian cheer of either mind or body to the multitudes, and so a few of us, who are more fortunate, are endeavouring to raise a fund to buy the poor some meat and drink and means of warmth.

SCROOGE: Why?

BUSINESSMAN # 2: We choose this time, Mr. Scrooge, because it is a time above all others when want is keenly felt. What shall I put you down for?

SCROOGE: Why, nothing of course.

BUSINESSMAN # 1: I see. You wish to remain anonymous.

SCROOGE: I wish to be left alone, gentlemen. You ask me what I wish – that is what I wish. I don't make myself merry at Christmas, and I can't afford to make the idle people merry. I help to support the establishments I mentioned through my taxes. They cost enough, and those who are badly off must take advantage of them.

BUSINESSMAN # 2: But many can't, Mr. Scrooge. And some would rather die.

SCROOGE: Well, if they would rather die, then they had better do it, and decrease the surplus population.

BUSINESSMAN # 1: But you're a wealthy man of business, sir. Surely you can have some pity?

SCROOGE: Pity is not my business. It's enough for a man to understand his own business, and not to interfere with other people's. My business occupies me constantly. Good afternoon, gentlemen.

BUSINESSMAN # 2: But, Mr. Scrooge ...

SCROOGE: GOOD AFTERNOON, GENTLEMEN!

     Wow. The dictionary was right! What a cheapskate! What a tightwad! What a skinflint and penny-pincher this Mr. Scrooge was. I mean, all these poor businessmen wanted was to “ make some slight provision for the poor and destitute.” Oh. Wait a second. I wonder why they only want to make a “slight provision”? And why, only, at “this time.” Scrooge gets all the bad press – but I wonder if he didn't realize something about this Christmas spirit of generosity that these businessmen were so busy promoting. Were they really hoping to help the poor and destitute? Surely, if they had real concern for the poor and destitute, they'd be making more than a “slight provision” for them – and they'd be doing it more than simply once a year. I wonder if this might not be the sort of thing that convinced Ebenezer that “Christmas, sir, is a humbug.” Maybe Ebenezer realized that if Christmas only makes a difference for one day or a few days out of the year then it means nothing. If that's as seriously as we take the appearance of Jesus, the coming of God to earth, then maybe there is “an attitude or spirit of pretense and deception” around this thing we call Christmas. Because, as the Ghost of Christmas Present said to Ebenezer, “the child born in Bethlehem does not live just one day of the year, but all the days of the year.” Perhaps, Ebenezer realized, as he talked wit these businessmen, that they hadn't been touched by the spirit of Christmas and they hadn't been changed by the spirit of Christmas. They had, at most, been shamed by the spirit of Christmas into making “some slight provision for the poor and destitute” - perhaps a result of feeling guilty that they did nothing for the poor and destitute the rest of the year. Perhaps. And, if so – then, indeed, Christmas is a humbug.

     How do we make sure that Christmas isn't a humbug in our own lives? By realizing that God doesn't ask us to be generous and cheerful only for a few days out of the year – but for all the days of the year. Only by allowing the spirit of God to transform us completely, and not simply by letting the spirit of Christmas transform us for a few days.

     There came a point when Ebenezer realized that Christmas was not a humbug; when he realized that it actually meant something. Dickens makes that clear. Ebenezer

became as good a friend, as good a master, and as good a man, as the good old city knew, or any other good old city, town, or borough, in the good old world. Some people laughed to see the alteration in him, but he let them laugh, and little heeded them; for he was wise enough to know that nothing ever happened on this globe, for good, at which some people did not have their fill of laughter in the outset; and knowing that such as these would be blind anyway, he thought it quite as well that they shuld wrinkle up their eyes in grins, as have the malady in less attractive forms. His own heart laughed: and that was quite enough for him. ... And it was always said of him, that he knew how to keep Christmas well, if any man alive possessed the knowledge.

     Ebenezer knew how to keep Christmas well because he finally realized that Christmas had to make a difference to his entire life, and not just to a few days out of the year. And so, I leave you with the words of Charles Dickens: “May that be truly said of us, and all of us! And so, God Bless Us, Every One!”

A Thought For The Week Of December 22

"The angel went to her and said, 'Greetings, you who are highly favored! The Lord is with you.' Mary was greatly troubled at his words and wondered what kind of greeting this might be." (Luke 1:28-29) Sometimes when God calls us to do his work it is perplexing and troubling and maybe even frightening. Because, really, who are we to do God's work? That seems to have been Mary's reaction to the news that she was favoured by God. "Greetings, you who are highly favoured! The Lord is with you." I can imagine Mary's reaction. It would probably be something like, "Uh oh. What does he want?" Caution, suspicion, even fear. That would be a normal response. Let's face it. God generally calls us to do the things we'd really rather not do. If we really wanted to do them, after all, we'd be doing them already. And when God calls us, we say "Uh oh. What do you want? Really? You must want someone else. It couldn't be me." Because, really, why would it be me? Or you? Who are we that God should call us? And even in the Bible, so many of those called by God didn't want to be called by God and sometimes tried to avoid and escape from that divine call. Because God asks us to do tough things, not easy things. So we think - "there must be someone else." Even Mary was troubled and perplexed and frightened by God's call. But when you stop and think about it - who else is there? Who else will God call? And if it really is God calling, then surely God must see in us the ability to do what we feel called to do. We just have to listen for the call. We have to try to figure out who our "angel" is - who it is who speaks God's word to us and brings God's call to us - because, after all, an angel is a messenger, and not necessarily a spiritual being. Mary responded to her angel. She was troubled by it all, but she responded. I guess we should too, when we're convinced that God is calling. Have a great week, and a very merry Christmas!

December 21 sermon: Failure Is Not An Option

In the sixth month of Elizabeth’s pregnancy, God sent the angel Gabriel to Nazareth, a town in Galilee, to a virgin pledged to be married to a man named Joseph, a descendant of David. The virgin’s name was Mary. The angel went to her and said, “Greetings, you who are highly favored! The Lord is with you.” Mary was greatly troubled at his words and wondered what kind of greeting this might be. But the angel said to her, “Do not be afraid, Mary; you have found favor with God. You will conceive and give birth to a son, and you are to call him Jesus. He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High. The Lord God will give him the throne of his father David, and he will reign over Jacob’s descendants forever; his kingdom will never end.” “How will this be,” Mary asked the angel, “since I am a virgin?” The angel answered, “The Holy Spirit will come on you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you. So the holy one to be born will be called the Son of God. Even Elizabeth your relative is going to have a child in her old age, and she who was said to be unable to conceive is in her sixth month. For no word from God will ever fail.” “I am the Lord’s servant,” Mary answered. “May your word to me be fulfilled.” Then the angel left her. 

(Luke 1:26-38)

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

    It’s dangerous to assume anything, of course, but I have a high degree of suspicion that most people are familiar with Apollo 13. It was the mission to the moon that didn’t get to the moon. It launched on April 11, 1970, and two days later an oxygen tank on board exploded, crippling the ship. The crew had to deal with problems such as loss of electrical power, limited heat and a serious shortage of drinkable water. Most dangerous, though, was that the air filtration system - which removed carbon dioxide from the capsule and replaced it with oxygen - was severely damaged. The problems with trying to fix it were well documented by the 1995 movie “Apollo 13.” Trying to fix the system meant literally trying to find a way to fit a square peg into a round hole. The technicians at Mission Control were mystified. They were ordered by the head of Mission Control to look at every option available to find a solution. They were given only one restriction - “failure,” they were told, “is not an option.” And it wasn’t. A solution was found, and a jury-rigged air filtration system lasted long enough to get the three astronauts safely back to earth. Too many people, I think, look for reasons to fail rather than opportunities to succeed because, truth be told, it’s a lot easier to fail than it is to succeed. As I’ve sometimes said, if you really, really want to succeed - then plan to fail, because if you plan to fail, you’ll succeed at that plan every time.

    God never plans to fail. Somehow, and in some way, God’s plans will work out. It’s not always easy to see. The world doesn’t always make it easy to see - but it’s true. God doesn’t plan to fail, and God will not fail. God’s promises will not fail. As the angel said to Mary, “no word from God will ever fail.” But sometimes we wonder don’t we. “We hear the Christmas angels - their great glad tidings tell …” But the tidings are of peace on earth. The tidings are of good will and justice. We don’t have to look very far to see examples of places where there’s no peace. About 150 innocent children killed by terrorists at a school in Pakistan. That isn’t peace. A former Vice President of the United States saying that he doesn’t care if innocent people got picked up and tortured in the fight against terrorism. That isn’t good will and justice. And those are just two noteworthy examples from the news in the last few days. Peace? Good will? Justice? These are promised by God’s word. Has God’s word failed? I don’t think so. Because failure is not an option when it comes to God’s word.

    Think about Mary in this passage? How must she have felt about God’s word? Here she was, a young woman about to be married, almost certainly with children to come afterward - told that she’d be pregnant and giving birth before the marriage. Maybe that isn't such a big deal in 2014, but 2000 years ago it was a big deal! A very big deal! She’d be humiliated and probably cast aside by Joseph - quite possibly stoned. And none of it was her fault. Where was justice for Mary? Where could she go to find peace? How could she possibly expect to encounter good will? Fortunately, the Christmas story tells us that Joseph had a visit from the same angel to explain the situation to him, and he believed what the angel told him, but did life get that much easier for Mary?

    She watched her son grow up. She watched as he incurred the wrath of the religious leaders and the anger of local officials of the Roman Empire. For all we know, she may have been among the members of Jesus’ family referred to in Mark 3:21 who, concerned that he was angering so many people, thought that Jesus was “out of his mind.” She watched as he was put on trial, condemned and crucified - dying for proclaiming the love and grace of God. As she watched the baby she had given birth to in a manger taking his last agonizing breaths on the cross, I wonder what she thought about those words - “no word from God will ever fail.” It must have looked like failure to Mary.

    So, did the word of God fail? Let’s think for a moment. What is the word of God? From John’s Gospel: “In the beginning was the word, and the word was with God and the word was God. … And the word became flesh and dwelt among us.” There’s a deep truth that John shares with us here. The true word of God isn’t the Bible. I honour the Bible. It has a cherished place in my heart. But the true word of God is Jesus. The Bible is made up of words on pages. Jesus was God’s word lived out, put into action, demonstrating God’s ways. So if we want to hold on to the words the angel offered to Mary - “No word from God will ever fail” - then the question we’re really asking is whether Jesus failed. The answer, to me, is clearly no.

    Jesus overcame. Jesus faced all that the powerful of his day could throw at him, and he overcame. He was born in humble circumstances - but he changed the world. His life was a short one, not much travelled - but he changed the world. His death was horrendous; even gruesome - but he changed the world. All because the child who was born in a manger and the man who died on a cross would rise from the dead and show us that God could triumph over even those things that seem to have the most power over us.

    You see, Christmas leads to Easter. You should never take one without the other, because if you do you only get a small part of the story, but you need the whole story to really understand what God is saying. This is what Christian faith is all about: Christmas leads to Easter; sorrow leads to joy; despair leads to hope; crucifixion leads to resurrection; death leads to life. “No word from God will ever fail.” That doesn’t mean it’s always going to be easy. That doesn’t mean there will never be troubles along the way. That doesn’t mean that we won’t sometimes suffer heart-wrenching sorrow and despair on the path. Mary did. So did Jesus. But they both knew this - “no word from God will ever fail.” God would see them through anything. God will see us through anything. Failure, indeed, is not an option.

A Thought For The Week Of December 15

"I eagerly expect and hope that I will in no way be ashamed, but will have sufficient courage so that now as always Christ will be exalted in my body, whether by life or by death." (Philippians 1:20) I hope that I will never be ashamed of Christ. One of the things that our society seems to try to do to us is shame us into not being open about our faith. Faith and religion we're told are private matters to be lived out at home or in church, but not publicly. That, of course, would be to fundamentally deny the gospel, which tells us to make disciples. You can't make disciples if you';re ashamed of your faith or if you're shamed into keeping your faith to yourself. So I think Christians need to be bolder  in speaking publicly about what we believe. Not aggressive or obnoxious or judgmental or arrogant - but bolder in proclaiming to all that the grace of God has come in Jesus. Things, of course, were much harder in Paul's day. Here in Canada, aside from the fact that some people won;t like it, there's really no risk involved in sharing our faith or talking about grace or Jesus. In Paul's day the risk was greater, so he writes that "Christ will be exalted in my body, whether by life or by death." He was willing to give his life for Christ - we're only called to live for Christ; to not be ashamed of letting the people around us know that Jesus is, in fact, our Lord. Christmas gives us an opportunity to do that - because it's the one time of year when people are expecting to hear the story, it's a little less threatening perhaps for us to tell the story. So, take advantage of this opportunity to tell people about Jesus. Have a great week!